Talk:Opensim 2.0: Difference between revisions
From Open Metaverse Wiki
(Propsed name change) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Opensim 2.0 is the name we are giving to our first test platform." I think we should change that name. I do agree that the Open Metaverse must be based on opensim but as an independent fork, not as a replacement for the official one. In the end there may well be no shared code at all. Besides, opensimulator.org's dev team will continue to develop their take on the | "Opensim 2.0 is the name we are giving to our first test platform." I think we should change that name. I do agree that the Open Metaverse must be based on opensim but as an independent fork, not as a replacement for the official one. In the end there may well be no shared code at all. Besides, opensimulator.org's dev team will continue to develop their take on the software and it will be very confusing if two different teams use the same name. | ||
I suggest we simply call it Open Metaverse because that is exactly what it is. Meta did not come up with the metaverse name and I can't imagine they have any proprietary rights to it. | I suggest we simply call it Open Metaverse because that is exactly what it is. Meta did not come up with the metaverse name and I can't imagine they have any proprietary rights to it. | ||
Revision as of 16:41, 16 April 2023
"Opensim 2.0 is the name we are giving to our first test platform." I think we should change that name. I do agree that the Open Metaverse must be based on opensim but as an independent fork, not as a replacement for the official one. In the end there may well be no shared code at all. Besides, opensimulator.org's dev team will continue to develop their take on the software and it will be very confusing if two different teams use the same name.
I suggest we simply call it Open Metaverse because that is exactly what it is. Meta did not come up with the metaverse name and I can't imagine they have any proprietary rights to it.
